3.2

The Genetics of Similarity

What accounts for the similarities among all human beings, such as the universal capacity for language or loyalty to a family or clan? Evolutionary psychologists believe the answer lies partly in genetic dispositions that developed during the evolutionary history of our species.

Evolution and Natural Selection

Researchers in evolutionary psychology emphasize the evolutionary mechanisms that might help explain our human commonalities in a variety of areas, such as personality, emotion, sexual behavior, or reasoning. To read the messages from the past that are locked in our genes, we must first understand the nature of evolution itself. Evolution is basically a change in gene frequencies within a population, a change that typically takes place over many generations. As particular genes become more common or less common in the population, so do the characteristics they influence. These developments account for changes within a species. And when two populations within a species become geographically separated and must adapt to different conditions, eventually those two populations may evolve into two different species.

Evolutionary psychologists are interested in the origins of many human behaviors, such as smiling and laughter, which are universal among primates and are part of our shared evolutionary heritage.

Why exactly do gene frequencies in a population change? During the division of the cells that produce sperm and eggs, if an error occurs in the copying of the original DNA sequence, genes can mutate. In addition, during the formation of a sperm or an egg, small segments of genetic material cross over from one member of a chromosome pair to another, exchanging places prior to the final cell division. As genes spontaneously mutate and recombine during the production of sperm and eggs, new genetic variations, and therefore potential new traits, keep arising.

But that is only part of the story. According to the principle of natural selection, first formulated in general terms by British naturalist Charles Darwin in On the Origin of Species (1859/1964), the fate of these genetic variations depends on the environment. Darwin did not actually know about genes, as their discovery had not yet been widely publicized, but he realized that a species' characteristics must somehow be transmitted biologically from one generation to the next.

The fundamental idea behind natural selection is this: In a given species living in a particular environment, some individuals with a genetically influenced trait tend to be more successful than others in finding food, surviving the elements, and fending off enemies—and are therefore better at staying alive long enough to produce offspring. As a result, their genes will become more and more common in the population, having been “selected” by reproductive success. Over many generations, these genes may even spread throughout the species. In contrast, those individuals whose traits are not as adaptive in the struggle for survival will not be as “reproductively fit”: They will be more likely to die before reproducing, and their genes—and the traits influenced by those genes—will therefore become less and less common, and may possibly even disappear.

Scientists debate how gradually or abruptly evolutionary changes occur and whether competition for survival is always the primary mechanism of change, but they agree on the basic importance of evolution. During the past century and a half, Darwin's ideas have been resoundingly supported by findings in anthropology, botany, and molecular genetics (Ruse, 2010). Scientists have actually watched some organisms evolving, such as microbes, insects, and plants. Some rapid evolutionary changes, in mammals as well as microbes, are due to human activity. For example, the horns of bighorn rams have been getting smaller because of trophy hunting, which removes animals with larger horns from the breeding population (Coltman et al., 2003). Researchers have even identified specific genes that account for evolutionary changes that have occurred in animals in the wild, such as the transformation of mice and lizards from light colored to dark colored (or vice versa) as the animals have migrated into different environments (Des Roches et al., 2013; Hoekstra et al., 2006). Evolutionary principles such as natural selection guide all of the biological sciences.

Natural Selection

Although many evolutionary theorists have assumed that human evolution pretty much stopped thousands of years ago, scientists have found evidence of natural selection occurring occasionally in humans over just a few generations, in response to changing conditions. For instance, when Africans were brought to America as slaves, they had a genetic variation that protected them against malaria. Over time, as malaria became less of an environmental threat in the United States, natural selection slowly stopped favoring those with this genetic variation, and today it is less common among African Americans than it is among indigenous Africans (Jin et al., 2012). You can learn more about evolutionary psychology by watching the video Evolutionary Psychology 1.

Watch

Evolutionary Psychology 1

Traits and Preferences Evolutionary biologists often start with an observation about some characteristic and then try to account for it in evolutionary terms. Why do male peacocks have such fabulous, flamboyant feathers, whereas females look so drab and dull? The evolutionary answer is that during the history of the species, males who could put on the flashiest display got the attention of females, and such males therefore had a better chance of reproducing. In contrast, all that females had to do was hang around and pick the guy with the fanciest feathers; they didn't even have to dress up.

Evolutionary psychologists work in the same way as biologists, but some take a slightly different tack: They start by asking what sorts of challenges human beings might have faced in their prehistoric past—say, having to decide which foods were safe to eat, or needing to size up a stranger's intentions quickly. Then they draw inferences about the behavioral tendencies that might have been selected because they helped our forebears solve these survival problems and enhanced their reproductive fitness. (They make no assumption about whether the behavior is adaptive or intelligent in the present environment.) Finally, they conduct research to see if those tendencies actually exist throughout the world.

Thus, our ancestors' need to avoid eating poisonous or rancid food might have led to an innate dislike for bitter tastes and rotten smells; those individuals who happened to be born with such dislikes would have stood a better chance of surviving long enough to reproduce. Similarly, it made good survival sense for our ancestors to develop an innate capacity for language and an ability to recognize faces and emotional expressions. But they would not have had much need for an innate ability to read or drive, inasmuch as books and cars had not yet been invented.

Mental Modules Is the human mind like a general-purpose computer waiting to be programmed? Many evolutionary psychologists don't think so. Instead, they say, environment and genetics have combined to give us a collection of specialized and independent “mental modules” to handle specific survival problems (Buss, 1995, 1999; Cosmides, Tooby, & Barkow, 1992; Marcus, 2004; Pinker, 2002). A module does not have to correspond to one specific brain area; it may involve several dispersed but interconnected areas of the brain, just as a computer file can be fragmented on a hard drive.

Suppose that you are playing a game for money with a complete stranger whom you'll probably never see again. You can share your winnings with each other or just keep them all to yourselves. The smart thing to do is to keep all the money. Why would you give anything to a total stranger in a one-time interaction? Yet people do tend to share some of their winnings with strangers, just as they usually tip a waiter at a restaurant they won't go back to (Delton et al., 2011). Why? Evolutionary psychologists would say that the reason people are often generous, even when a generous act seems to hurt them, is that natural selection has shaped us to cooperate as a way of shoring up relationships. Social life is inherently uncertain; we cannot always predict who will be friend or foe in the future. So natural selection has produced something like a “cooperate because you might need this person later” module.

Critics are concerned that the notion of mental modules might lead to the misguided assumption that virtually every human activity and capacity, from cleanliness to cruelty, is innate. Frans de Waal (2002), a zoologist and evolutionary theorist, cautions against the impulse to assume that if a trait exists and has a genetic component, then it must be adaptive and be driven by a specialized module. After all, pimples and male-pattern baldness are not particularly adaptive, and neither one has a module associated with it! Many evolved and inherited traits are merely byproducts of other traits, and some are even dysfunctional—a fact you know if you have a bad back, which is one unfortunate consequence of our evolved ability to walk on two feet. To understand our evolutionary legacy, de Waal argues, we must consider not just individual traits in isolation but also the whole package of traits that characterizes the species. This is as true for psychological traits as for physical ones. A leading researcher explains more about the evolutionary perspective in the video Evolutionary Psychology 2.

Watch

Evolutionary Psychology 2

The debate over modules will undoubtedly continue. But regardless of whether modules are the best way to describe traits that appear to be inherited, be careful to avoid the common error of assuming that if some behavior or trait exists, it must therefore be adaptive.